The goal and tone of this brief
article is to be focused on the internal world of the religious man.
People wonder why on earth I find politics interesting. How can I
tolerate so many conflicting opinions, the nastiness, and
one-ups-man-ship. “I was raised in church”, I respond with the
cool air of a grizzled Vietnam veteran.
Obviously, not all churches are nasty
and not all religion is toxic. Faith, can have a great positive
influence on the lives of individuals, families, and communities.
Everything they say about it is true. It's redeeming, it's life
changing, it's fulfilling, but is it freeing? One better, do we
believe that liberty is even a valid criteria for religion?
I know from secular study that the
rarest and most gratifying state of a man (or woman) is one of
volition, autonomy, and personal power. One would be extremely hard
pressed to make the case that, historically speaking, religion has
been a champion of this desired state.
Even though we have the spotty track
record of oppression and, not to use too harsh a word, genocide that
has been a by product of religious institutions of the past. I wonder
if the original intent of Christianity was to set the oppressed free
from the oppressors. Was the original intent of Jesus to upset the
oppressive and religious institutions of his day or was it to simply
replace it with one that he liked better and that just happened to be
far more subjective?
I think the subjectivity of our modern
Christian “laws” is it's most damnable characteristic. In the
80's it was makeup and jewelry for women, in the 90's it was rock
music with too many beats-per-minute, in the new century it was Harry
Potter books, and yet all of these things have been by and large
accepted, and assimilated into our “safe list” even though the
hew and cry and authority of scripture was touted from every pulpit.
Are we willing to admit that we simply don't know what rules to
enforce on ourselves and others and that scares us?
The end result is the modern
Christian, dutifully crafting cages for himself with whatever he can
find to make both his faith and prison tangible. The internal guilt
burden that many religious people heap on themselves is a pitiful
practice. The Son of God was manifest as a man, sacrificed for
iniquity, and has empowered us with his spirit. Priority one seems to
be repeating the shadow of bondage, only to a lesser extent in our
personal lives and relationships just as thousands of years of
corrupt institutions have taught us to do. I can't help but think
that when we debate the importance of the Torah, or New Covenant vs.
Old or any clever mix in between, we are acting in antipathy to the
very spirit of God who designed us to thrive under conditions of
volition, autonomy, personal power, and mental well being.
collection plate :)
ReplyDelete